Loading...
Loading...
Borys Ulanenko
CEO of ArmsLength AI

Get the latest transfer pricing insights, AI benchmarking tips, and industry updates delivered straight to your inbox.
The income inclusion rule (IIR) is Pillar Two’s primary mechanism for enforcing the 15% global minimum tax by charging top-up tax at the parent level when a group’s jurisdictional GloBE ETR falls below 15%. In practice, you compute top-up tax jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction using financial-accounting-based GloBE income and covered taxes, then allocate and charge it top-down to the Ultimate Parent Entity (or, in some cases, an intermediate parent or a partially-owned parent). IIR generally takes priority over the UTPR backstop, and it is typically reduced (sometimes to zero) where a jurisdiction has a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT).
In 2025, “IIR in practice” also means building around the OECD’s evolving compliance architecture (including updated Administrative Guidance and GloBE Information Return (GIR) materials released in January 2025). (oecd.org)
The income inclusion rule is designed to move minimum-tax enforcement to the parent jurisdiction, rather than relying only on source-country adjustments. Under the OECD/G20 GloBE rules, the IIR charges a parent entity a top-up tax for the parent’s share of low-taxed profits earned by low-taxed constituent entities. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
Pillar Two is not “one calculation.” It’s an ordering system that coordinates multiple mechanisms:
| Mechanism | What it does | Practical consequence |
|---|---|---|
| QDMTT | Allows the source jurisdiction to collect top-up tax domestically (if “qualified”) | Often reduces or eliminates IIR exposure for that jurisdiction |
| IIR (income inclusion rule) | Collects remaining top-up tax at the parent level (top-down) | Primary charging rule; drives most group-level compliance |
| UTPR | Backstop allocation of remaining top-up tax to other jurisdictions | Kicks in when IIR doesn’t fully collect (see /blog/utpr-guide) |
This ordering is fundamental to forecasting where the cash tax cost lands, where returns are filed, and which entities need Pillar Two-grade data controls. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2; OECD Consolidated Commentary (2025))
If you need a Pillar Two refresher before diving into the IIR mechanics, start with /blog/pillar-two-guide and the hub /blog/pillar-two-cbcr-guide (many groups reuse CbCR pipelines, but the data requirements are stricter for GloBE).
Groups are generally in scope when consolidated revenue meets the EUR 750m threshold in at least two of the four Fiscal Years immediately preceding the tested Fiscal Year (aligned conceptually with CbCR scope, but not identical in mechanics). (oecd.org)
The rules also carve out certain excluded entities (e.g., government entities, pension funds, certain investment funds as UPE), plus certain chains predominantly owned by excluded entities. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapters 1–2)
Practical note: domestic implementations often translate “EUR 750m” into local currency using a specified FX approach, which can matter in edge cases and forecasts.
| Term | Meaning (practitioner view) | Why it matters for IIR |
|---|---|---|
| Constituent Entity (CE) | Entity included in the GloBE computation perimeter | Determines which entities feed the jurisdictional ETR and allocation |
| UPE | Ultimate Parent Entity that prepares (or would prepare) consolidated financials | Usually the primary IIR taxpayer if its jurisdiction has a qualified IIR |
| Intermediate Parent Entity (IPE) | Parent entity below the UPE | Can become the IIR taxpayer if the UPE jurisdiction doesn’t apply a qualified IIR |
| POPE (Partially-Owned Parent Entity) | Parent with >20% of its ownership interests in profits held (directly/indirectly) by persons that are not constituent entities of the MNE group | Can be required to apply IIR in split-ownership structures (oecd.org) |
| Inclusion Ratio | Limits the IIR charge to the parent’s ownership-based share of the low-taxed income | Prevents “taxing other people’s profits” where there are outside owners |
| Minority-Owned Constituent Entity / Minority-Owned Subgroup | Certain minority-owned entities/subgroups are computed as if they were a separate MNE group (and excluded from the remainder group’s jurisdictional blending) | Prevents “blending away” low-tax outcomes (or diluting top-up) through broader group aggregation (oecd.org) |
(OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2; OECD Consolidated Commentary (2025))
There isn’t a single universal “IIR ownership percentage.” Instead:
A common implementation error is treating IIR as “UPE-only.” In reality, liability can shift to intermediate parents (or a POPE) depending on (i) whether the UPE jurisdiction has a qualified IIR in effect and (ii) the group’s ownership and minority investor profile.
At a high level, the IIR doesn’t create a separate tax base. It charges top-up tax based on the jurisdictional ETR computed under GloBE rules, which rely on financial accounting income with standardized adjustments. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapters 3–5)
In simplified form (ignoring certain adjustments), for each jurisdiction:
The key practical point: statutory rate ≠ GloBE ETR. Credits, incentives, timing differences, and deferred tax mechanics can drive GloBE ETR below 15% even in “high-tax” countries. Administrative Guidance has continued to refine practical treatment in several areas (including transition and compliance mechanics). (oecd.org)
Start from financial accounting net income/loss and apply standardized adjustments. This is why many groups anchor Pillar Two to the consolidation trial balance—then layer adjustments in a controlled mapping. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 3)
Covered taxes are not “whatever is in the tax provision.” They are defined and adjusted under GloBE, including specific constraints around deferred tax treatment (a recurring focus of Administrative Guidance and implementation choices). (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 4; OECD Administrative Guidance (June 2024; January 2025)) (oecd.org)
Aggregate covered taxes and GloBE income across all constituent entities in the jurisdiction to compute the jurisdictional effective tax rate. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 5)
SBIE reduces the base subjected to top-up tax using a carve-out for payroll and tangible assets. Many regimes follow transitional rates that decline over time.
Important timing detail (easy to get wrong): under the EU Minimum Tax Directive, the “year labels” in the SBIE transitional tables map to fiscal years beginning from 31 December of the listed calendar year (i.e., the row you use depends on your fiscal-year start date, not the fiscal-year end date). (eur-lex.europa.eu)
Example transitional rates (EU Directive illustration; selected rows):
| Fiscal years beginning from 31 Dec of | Payroll carve-out | Tangible assets carve-out |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10.0% | 8.0% |
| 2024 | 9.8% | 7.8% |
| 2025 | 9.6% | 7.6% |
(EU Directive (EU) 2022/2523, transitional SBIE relief mechanics)
Where a jurisdiction has a qualified QDMTT, it generally reduces the residual top-up tax that would otherwise be collected under IIR. This is why a purely parent-country IIR model is incomplete: you need QDMTT eligibility and “qualified status” tracking jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 5; OECD Administrative Guidance; OECD Central Record)
Treat QDMTT qualification as a “master data” problem, not a spreadsheet note. Many groups maintain a controlled table keyed by jurisdiction and fiscal year: (i) QDMTT in force? (ii) transitional qualified status per the OECD Central Record? (iii) effective dates and local filing requirements?
After computing top-up tax at the jurisdiction level, it is allocated to constituent entities and then charged to parent entities through IIR using ownership-based limitations (Inclusion Ratio) and ordering rules. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2; OECD Consolidated Commentary (2025))
The IIR is designed to operate top-down: if the UPE is in a jurisdiction that applies a qualified IIR, the UPE generally bears the group’s IIR charge (subject to inclusion ratios and other ordering mechanics). If not, the charge can shift down the chain.
| Fact pattern | Which entity applies IIR? | What you must model |
|---|---|---|
| UPE jurisdiction has a qualified IIR in effect | UPE | Consolidated GloBE calc + jurisdiction rollups + UPE filing/payment |
| UPE jurisdiction does not apply a qualified IIR | Intermediate parent in a jurisdiction with IIR (to its share) | Ownership chain, inclusion ratios, and which parents are “activated” |
| Split-ownership structure (significant minority interest) | POPE may be required to apply IIR | POPE identification + minority ownership tracking + double-charge prevention logic |
(OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
In split-ownership cases, charging everything at the UPE can misalign the tax burden relative to minority investors. POPE rules are intended to ensure that top-up tax can be charged at a level where the economics are shared appropriately among shareholders, while coordinating to avoid double charging. (OECD Consolidated Commentary (2025))
POPE addresses who is charged under IIR in certain ownership structures. Separately, the Model Rules also require special computation for Minority-Owned Constituent Entities and Minority-Owned Subgroups—in effect, treating them as if they were a separate MNE group and excluding them from the remainder group’s jurisdictional blending. This can materially change jurisdictional ETRs and top-up tax outcomes in models that otherwise “just roll up by country.” (oecd.org)
The UTPR is explicitly designed as a backstop. In well-coordinated outcomes, top-up tax is collected first via QDMTT (if qualified), then via IIR; UTPR applies only to residual amounts not collected. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2; OECD Consolidated Commentary (2025))
If you are designing your first end-to-end Pillar Two model, build the UTPR logic early—even if you “don’t expect UTPR.” UTPR exposure often appears due to qualification gaps, effective date mismatches, or data quality issues rather than intentional low-tax planning. See /blog/utpr-guide.
Teams that succeed treat IIR/UTPR as a coordinated rules engine:
For related documentation practices, see /blog/transfer-pricing-documentation-guide (many controls and evidence patterns translate well).
“Implemented” can mean (i) law enacted, (ii) effective for fiscal years beginning, and/or (iii) OECD transitional qualified status. For IIR planning, you typically need all three.
The OECD also notes that the 2025 Consolidated Commentary incorporates Agreed Administrative Guidance released up to March 2025, which matters when you are aligning calculations and positions across jurisdictions. (oecd.org)
| Jurisdiction / region | IIR status signal (as of 28 Dec 2025) | Primary reference |
|---|---|---|
| EU | IIR generally applies for FYs beginning on/after 31 Dec 2023, with optional deferrals for some Member States (Directive Article 50); UTPR generally from FYs beginning on/after 31 Dec 2024 | EU Directive (EU) 2022/2523 (eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| UK | “Multinational Top-up Tax” (IIR-equivalent) for periods beginning on/after 31 Dec 2023; UTPR from periods beginning on/after 31 Dec 2024 | GOV.UK Pillar Two guidance |
| Japan | IIR effective for consolidated accounting years beginning on/after 1 April 2024 (Japan also links scope to the “two-of-four prior years” EUR 750m test); Japan’s QDMTT and UTPR apply from 1 April 2026 under the cited summary | PwC Japan tax summary (taxsummaries.pwc.com) |
| Korea | IIR generally effective for fiscal years beginning on/after 1 Jan 2024; UTPR delayed by 12 months to fiscal years beginning on/after 1 Jan 2025 (per enacted reforms described in the cited alert) | EY Korea alert (ey.com) |
| Switzerland | Switzerland applied QDMTT from 1 Jan 2024; the Swiss Federal Council announced application of IIR effective from 1 Jan 2025; UTPR delayed indefinitely (per cited alert) | EY Switzerland alert (ey.com) |
| United States | The U.S. has not implemented Pillar Two IIR/UTPR into domestic law as of 28 Dec 2025; separately, the U.S. Treasury’s June 28, 2025 statement describes a proposed “side-by-side” concept under which U.S.-parented groups would be exempt from other countries’ IIR/UTPR, subject to further Inclusive Framework work | U.S. Treasury (28 Jun 2025) + reporting context (home.treasury.gov) |
Do not treat the OECD Central Record as your only source of truth. It is essential for transitional qualification reliance, but “not listed” is not the same as “not qualified,” and local law effective dates can differ from OECD registry updates.
IIR will feel familiar to anyone who has worked with controlled foreign company (CFC) regimes—but the similarities can be misleading.
| Dimension | IIR (Pillar Two) | Typical CFC regimes |
|---|---|---|
| Tax base | Financial-accounting-based GloBE income with standardized adjustments | Domestic tax base and categories (often anti-deferral concepts) |
| Blending | Primarily jurisdictional blending | Can be entity, jurisdictional, or global blending depending on regime |
| Rate objective | Uniform 15% minimum via top-up | Varies by country; not designed around a single global minimum |
| Coordination | Built-in ordering (QDMTT → IIR → UTPR) and allocation mechanics | Less standardized cross-border coordination |
| Data burden | High: consolidation + covered taxes (current/deferred) + elections/safe harbors | High, but typically anchored in domestic tax computations |
(OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapters 2–5; OECD Administrative Guidance)
As of 28 Dec 2025, the U.S. has not enacted Pillar Two IIR/UTPR into domestic law. The U.S. Treasury’s June 28, 2025 statement describes a proposed “side-by-side” approach under which U.S.-parented groups would be exempt from IIR/UTPR in recognition of existing U.S. minimum tax rules, subject to further Inclusive Framework work. (home.treasury.gov)
Even if you are not U.S.-parented, this stance can affect counterparty expectations, cross-border dispute dynamics, and transitional UTPR risk assessments.
The examples below are simplified to illustrate mechanics. Real computations must layer in additional GloBE adjustments, deferred tax rules, and local implementation details. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021); OECD Administrative Guidance)
Facts (calendar-year FY 2025, beginning 1 Jan 2025):
Step 1 — ETR (Country B)
ETR = 5 / 100 = 5%
Step 2 — Top-up percentage
Top-up % = 15% − 5% = 10%
Step 3 — SBIE and Excess Profit
Step 4 — Jurisdictional top-up tax
Top-up tax = 10% × 95.70 = 9.57
IIR charge
UPE owns 100% → Inclusion Ratio ~100% → UPE pays 9.57 under IIR.
Assume Example 1, but Country B has a qualified QDMTT, and the domestic minimum tax computation produces qualified domestic top-up tax due for FY 2025.
Result: Country A’s UPE has no IIR payment for Country B to the extent the qualified domestic top-up tax is due (and properly computed/aligned). The EU Directive frames this as reducing IIR top-up tax “up to zero” by the qualified domestic top-up tax due. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
From a controversy and cash-tax perspective, qualified QDMTTs often “localize” top-up tax and reduce cross-border allocation disputes—provided your qualification and computation positions are supportable.
Facts:
Top-up computation (Country D):
POPE outcome (conceptual):
/blog/cbcr-preparation-guide) and transfer pricing files (/blog/transfer-pricing-documentation-guide).If your group already runs a structured benchmarking and margin-testing process (/blog/benchmarking-study-guide), reuse the governance patterns: version control, sign-offs, and “single source of truth” inputs. Pillar Two fails most often as a data governance project, not a tax theory project.
Pillar Two includes (and has continued to develop) compliance simplifications—some elective, some transitional. At a minimum, implementation teams should map:
The practical takeaway: even if your tax math is right, your filing/exchange design can still fail if you don’t align to the GIR architecture that relevant jurisdictions expect.
/blog/pillar-two-guide/blog/utpr-guide/blog/pillar-two-cbcr-guide/glossary/income-inclusion-rule/glossary/pillar-twoThe income inclusion rule is Pillar Two’s primary charging rule that imposes top-up tax on a parent entity when a jurisdiction’s GloBE ETR for group entities is below 15%. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
You compute jurisdictional GloBE income and adjusted covered taxes, calculate the jurisdictional ETR, apply the 15% minimum rate to determine a top-up percentage, reduce the base for SBIE, then net down (up to zero) for any qualified domestic top-up tax due before charging the residual through IIR. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
Primarily country-by-country (jurisdictional blending). You compute an ETR per jurisdiction and determine top-up tax separately for each jurisdiction. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 5)
Usually the UPE, if the UPE jurisdiction has a qualified IIR in effect. If not, the IIR can shift to an intermediate parent in a jurisdiction that applies IIR, and in split-ownership cases a POPE may be required to apply IIR. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
The Inclusion Ratio limits the parent entity’s IIR liability to the share of low-taxed income attributable to its ownership interest (so the parent doesn’t pay top-up tax on income economically owned by minority investors). (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
Yes. The GloBE ETR is based on adjusted covered taxes divided by GloBE income, and it can fall below 15% due to incentives, credits, and timing differences (including deferred tax effects). (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapters 3–5)
A qualified QDMTT generally reduces (and can eliminate) the residual top-up tax that would otherwise be collected under IIR for that jurisdiction—shifting collection to the source jurisdiction—to the extent qualified domestic top-up tax is due under the domestic minimum tax computation. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
IIR generally applies before UTPR. UTPR is intended as a backstop that allocates residual top-up tax to other jurisdictions only when it isn’t collected under a qualified QDMTT and/or IIR. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapter 2)
As of December 28, 2025, the U.S. has not implemented Pillar Two IIR/UTPR into domestic law. Separately, the U.S. Treasury’s June 28, 2025 statement describes a proposed “side-by-side” approach under which U.S.-parented groups would be excluded from IIR/UTPR, subject to further work through the Inclusive Framework. (home.treasury.gov)
Both can impose additional parent-level tax on low-taxed foreign income, but IIR uses a standardized GloBE base derived from financial accounts, targets a uniform 15% minimum, and is coordinated through ordering with QDMTT and UTPR—unlike most domestic CFC regimes. (OECD GloBE Model Rules (2021), Chapters 2–5)