Quick Definition
Documentation Threshold — A documentation threshold is the monetary limit (typically based on transaction value, revenue, or assets) that determines whether a taxpayer must prepare formal transfer pricing documentation.
Our glossary is continuously expanding. For deep-dive guides on specific topics, explore our blog or contact us with suggestions.
A documentation threshold is the monetary limit (typically based on transaction value, revenue, or assets) that determines whether a taxpayer must prepare formal transfer pricing documentation. Taxpayers below the threshold may face reduced or no documentation requirements; those above must comply with full documentation obligations. Thresholds vary significantly by jurisdiction and document type.
Documentation thresholds balance compliance burden against tax administration needs—exempting smaller transactions or entities while requiring full documentation for material controlled transactions.
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) acknowledge documentation thresholds in Chapter V. The Guidelines recognize that countries may establish documentation requirements applying only to certain categories of taxpayers, with limitations based on taxpayer size, transaction size, or other appropriate criteria.
For CbCR, BEPS Action 13 recommended a €750 million consolidated group revenue threshold. MNE groups with annual consolidated revenue at or above this threshold are generally required to file CbCR.
The Guidelines recognize the principle of proportionality: the costs and burdens of compliance with transfer pricing documentation requirements should be commensurate with the circumstances of each case.
Common Threshold Types:
| Threshold Type | Basis | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Revenue | Group-wide annual revenue | €750M for CbCR |
| Local Turnover | Entity's annual turnover | €50M for full Local File |
| Transaction Value | Per-transaction or aggregate | €100K per transaction type |
| Asset Value | Total assets of entity | €50M total assets |
| Combined Tests | Multiple criteria | Revenue AND controlled transactions |
Major Jurisdiction Thresholds (2024):
| Jurisdiction | Master File Threshold | Local File Threshold | CbCR Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | €100M group revenue | €6M goods/€600K services (per type) | €750M |
| UK | £200M turnover + £50M balance sheet + 250 employees | Same | €750M |
| France | €400M turnover/assets | €50K per transaction | €750M |
| Netherlands | No threshold | No threshold | €750M |
| Australia | AUD 1B | No threshold (materiality-based) | AUD 1B |
| United States | N/A (different system) | N/A (section 6662 standard) | USD 850M |
| India | INR 50 crore international transactions | Same | ₹5,500 crore |
Threshold ≠ Exemption from Arm's Length Principle: Being below documentation thresholds does not exempt you from the arm's length principle itself. Transactions must still be priced at arm's length—you may simply have reduced formal documentation requirements.
Scenario: GermanCo has the following profile:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Parent group consolidated revenue | €500 million |
| GermanCo annual turnover | €80 million |
| Intercompany goods purchases | €12 million |
| Intercompany service fees received | €400,000 |
| Intercompany royalty paid | €800,000 |
Threshold Analysis (Germany):
| Document | Threshold | GermanCo | Required? |
|---|---|---|---|
| CbCR | €750M group revenue | €500M | ❌ No |
| Master File | €100M group revenue | €500M | ✅ Yes |
| Local File - Goods | €6M per type | €12M | ✅ Yes (full) |
| Local File - Services | €600K per type | €400K | ❌ Simplified |
| Local File - Royalty | €600K per type | €800K | ✅ Yes (full) |
Result: GermanCo must prepare a Master File (or receive one from parent) and full Local File documentation for goods purchases and royalty payments. Service fee documentation can be simplified.
| Scenario | Consequence |
|---|---|
| No threshold met | Reduced/no formal documentation required |
| Threshold exceeded | Full documentation mandatory |
| Multiple thresholds | Document for each threshold exceeded |
| Threshold missed in audit | Documentation may be requested retroactively |
Thresholds Are Jurisdiction-Specific: A transaction below threshold in one country may exceed thresholds in the counterparty's jurisdiction. Both parties should assess their own documentation obligations—being below threshold at home doesn't eliminate obligations abroad.
It depends on the jurisdiction. Germany applies thresholds per transaction type (goods, services, etc.). France applies thresholds per individual transaction. Other countries may aggregate all controlled transactions. Always check specific local rules—misapplying thresholds can result in compliance failures.
Being just below a threshold is risky—small variations in transaction values could push you over. Many practitioners recommend preparing documentation even when just below thresholds: (1) values may be recalculated by tax authorities differently, (2) thresholds may decrease, (3) documentation provides penalty protection if adjustments occur.
Thresholds generally remain stable but can be adjusted by governments. Monitor local tax authority guidance annually. Some jurisdictions index thresholds to inflation; others make periodic legislative changes. The €750M CbCR threshold has remained stable since BEPS Action 13, but local documentation thresholds have changed in several countries.
Typically, transaction value is measured by the invoiced or agreed amounts for goods, services, royalties, or financing. For ongoing transactions, aggregate annual values are usually relevant. Some jurisdictions specify whether to use gross or net values, or whether to include related transactions. Check local rules for precise measurement guidance.
Some jurisdictions have adopted lower local thresholds or "secondary filing mechanisms." In such cases, the local subsidiary may be required to file CbCR locally even if the parent is below the €750M standard. Alternatively, some countries require "surrogate parent" filing. Check local rules for secondary filing obligations.
Documentation requirements typically apply year by year. If you fall below the threshold in a subsequent year, formal documentation requirements may no longer apply. However, some jurisdictions have "lookback" provisions or require continued documentation for specified periods after first exceeding thresholds.
Some jurisdictions offer simplified documentation for entities below certain thresholds—less detailed than full documentation but more than nothing. Examples include Germany's simplified records for smaller transactions and India's simplified documentation for entities below certain revenue levels. These are distinct from full exemptions.