Loading...
Loading...
Independence Indicator — Independence Indicator is a classification code used in commercial databases (particularly Bureau van Dijk's Orbis and Amadeus) to identify a company's ownership structure and degree of independence from parent companies.
Independence Indicator is a classification code used in commercial databases (particularly Bureau van Dijk's Orbis and Amadeus) to identify a company's ownership structure and degree of independence from parent companies. In transfer pricing benchmarking, independence indicators filter out companies with controlling shareholders—ensuring comparable companies are truly independent and their financial results are not distorted by related-party transactions.
The Bureau van Dijk (BvD) Independence Indicator uses letter codes A through D (plus U for unknown) based on the percentage of ownership held by shareholders.
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) require that comparables be independent—not subject to controlled transactions that would affect their profitability. The Guidelines (in Chapter III) note that identifying comparables requires a search for uncontrolled transactions whose characteristics are sufficiently similar to the controlled transaction.
While the OECD doesn't prescribe specific database indicators, the principle is clear: comparable companies must be independent parties whose results reflect arm's length market conditions.
US Treasury Regulations §1.482-1(d)(1) similarly require comparables to be "uncontrolled"—transactions or companies not influenced by related-party relationships.
The BvD Independence Indicator is the industry standard for screening company independence:
| Code | Meaning | Ownership Threshold | Use in TP |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | No shareholder with >25% direct or total ownership | Most independent | ✅ Accept |
| A+ | No shareholder with >25% direct ownership, no identified shareholder | Highly independent | ✅ Accept |
| A- | No shareholder with >25% direct ownership, some shareholder info missing | Likely independent | ✅ Accept |
| B | No shareholder with >50% direct or total ownership | Substantially independent | ✅ Accept |
| B+ | No shareholder with >50% direct ownership | Substantially independent | ✅ Accept |
| B- | No shareholder with >50% direct ownership, some info missing | Substantially independent | ⚠️ Review |
| C | Shareholder with >50% but independence not fully known | Potentially controlled | ⚠️ Caution |
| D | Shareholder with >50% direct or total ownership | Controlled entity | ❌ Reject |
| U | Unknown ownership structure | Cannot verify independence | ❌ Usually reject |
Standard Practice:
A and B are Safe Defaults: Most transfer pricing practitioners accept companies with BvD indicators A or B. These have no majority shareholder and are presumed to operate independently. C and D companies should generally be excluded or subjected to additional scrutiny.
Quantitative Screening with Independence Filter:
| Company | BvD Indicator | Ownership Structure | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| DistCo GmbH | A | No shareholder >25% | ✅ Include |
| LogiTrans AG | B+ | Largest shareholder 35% | ✅ Include |
| EuroSupply BV | C | One shareholder 48%, structure unclear | ⚠️ Review |
| TechDist SpA | D | 70% owned by MegaCorp | ❌ Exclude |
| GlobalParts Ltd | U | Ownership unknown | ❌ Exclude |
EuroSupply BV (C indicator) requires additional review:
Independence indicators are a starting point, not the final answer. Even companies with A or B ratings may have independence issues:
| Additional Check | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Related-party transactions | Material intercompany sales, services, or loans |
| Corporate group membership | Part of multinational structure (even minority ownership) |
| Common management | Shared directors or executives with other companies |
| Financial statements | Notes disclosing related-party transactions |
| Recent ownership changes | Former subsidiary now "independent" |
Indicator ≠ Guarantee: A company with BvD indicator "A" may still have significant related-party transactions if it trades with affiliated companies through minority ownership structures. Manual review should verify no material intercompany influence.
Comparable companies must reflect arm's length market conditions. Companies controlled by parent entities may have intercompany transactions (management fees, royalties, financing) that distort their reported profitability. Independence indicators identify companies operating without controlling shareholders—ensuring their results represent what independent parties would achieve.
D should generally be excluded—these are controlled entities. C requires case-by-case review—ownership is unclear but may be acceptable. If a company with indicator C has no material related-party transactions disclosed in financial statements, it may be includable. Document your reasoning for including any C-rated company.
Yes. Independence indicators address ownership, not functional comparability. A company may be fully independent (indicator A) but perform different functions than your tested party. Independence is necessary but not sufficient for comparability. Both independence and functional similarity are required.
Generally exclude U-rated companies—you can't verify they're independent. However, if the company is clearly relevant and other sources confirm independence (annual reports, regulatory filings), you may include it with documentation. Tax authorities may challenge U-rated comparables, so err on the side of caution.
The BvD indicator system is specific to Bureau van Dijk databases (Orbis, Amadeus, TP Catalyst). Other databases (Compustat, OneSource) may use different ownership metrics or no standardized indicator. When using non-BvD databases, manually verify ownership structures using shareholder data fields.
If a company was recently acquired or divested, consider whether its financial data reflects the ownership period. A company independent for 3 of 4 years in your analysis period may be acceptable—document the ownership change. If the ownership change occurred mid-year, consider whether to use only independent-period data.
No, but apply a consistent threshold. Most practitioners accept A and B indicators together. If you include B-rated companies, you should also include A-rated companies. Don't cherry-pick independence levels to achieve desired results. Document your acceptance criteria and apply them uniformly.