Loading...
Loading...
NACE Code (NACE) — NACE Code (Nomenclature of Economic Activities) is the European Union's industry classification system used to categorize businesses by their primary economic activity.
NACE Code (Nomenclature of Economic Activities) is the European Union's industry classification system used to categorize businesses by their primary economic activity. In transfer pricing benchmarking, NACE codes are the primary filter for identifying companies in the same or similar industries as the tested party. The current version (NACE Rev. 2) uses a hierarchical structure from broad sectors (1-digit) to specific activities (4-digit).
NACE codes are the standard industry classification in European databases like Orbis and Amadeus. The equivalent US system is SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) or NAICS (North American Industry Classification System).
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) identify industry characteristics as a key comparability factor in Chapter I. The Guidelines note that the industry in which the tested party and comparables operate may affect the comparison.
While the Guidelines don't mandate specific classification systems, they require that industry comparability be evaluated. NACE codes provide a standardized, objective framework for this analysis.
The Guidelines (in Chapter III) also note that database searches may appropriately start with a preliminary search using relatively wide-ranging criteria—industry codes like NACE are the typical starting point for these searches.
NACE Code Structure (Rev. 2):
| Level | Digits | Example | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section | Letter | G | Wholesale and retail trade |
| Division | 2-digit | 46 | Wholesale trade |
| Group | 3-digit | 46.5 | Wholesale of ICT equipment |
| Class | 4-digit | 46.52 | Wholesale of electronic equipment |
Using NACE Codes in Benchmarking:
| Step | Action | Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify tested party's NACE code | Based on primary activity |
| 2 | Start at 4-digit level | Most specific match |
| 3 | Expand if needed | Move to 3-digit if insufficient results |
| 4 | Consider related codes | Adjacent activities may be comparable |
| 5 | Verify through manual screening | NACE codes can be misclassified |
Start Narrow, Expand if Needed: Begin your search with the most specific 4-digit NACE code. If results are insufficient, expand to 3-digit or include related codes. Always document your code selection rationale.
Tested Party: Contract manufacturer of automotive components.
NACE Code Selection:
| Code | Description | Fit Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| 29.32 | Manufacture of other parts and accessories for motor vehicles | ✅ Primary code—direct match |
| 29.31 | Manufacture of electrical equipment for motor vehicles | ⚠️ May include if tested party makes electrical components |
| 28.99 | Manufacture of other special-purpose machinery n.e.c. | ⚠️ Related machinery manufacturing |
| 29.10 | Manufacture of motor vehicles | ❌ Full vehicle manufacturing—different functions |
Search Strategy:
Result: Starting with the primary NACE code ensures functional relevance. Expanding to related codes increases sample size while maintaining industry comparability.
| System | Coverage | Structure | Common Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| NACE | European Union | 4-digit hierarchical | Orbis, Amadeus (Europe) |
| SIC | United States (legacy) | 4-digit | Compustat, some older databases |
| NAICS | North America | 6-digit | US/Canada analyses |
Cross-referencing: When searching global databases, you may need to use multiple classification systems. Eurostat provides official NACE-to-SIC correspondence tables for mapping between systems.
| Tested Party Profile | Primary NACE Codes |
|---|---|
| Wholesale distribution | 46.XX (varies by product) |
| Contract manufacturing | 25-30 (varies by industry) |
| IT services | 62.01, 62.02 |
| Management consulting | 70.22 |
| Logistics/warehousing | 52.10, 52.29 |
| Marketing services | 73.11 |
| R&D services | 72.19 |
| Holding companies | 64.20 (often excluded) |
NACE Codes Can Be Wrong: Companies self-report or are assigned NACE codes that may not reflect actual activities. A "wholesale distributor" (NACE 46.XX) might actually manufacture. A "management consultant" (NACE 70.22) might provide IT services. Always verify through manual screening.
Start with the tested party's primary economic activity. Use the official NACE Rev. 2 structure from Eurostat or our NACE Code Selector. Match at the most specific 4-digit level. If unsure between codes, consider whether your tested party's functions align more closely with one activity over another. Document your selection rationale.
Yes, this is common practice. If your tested party's activities span related codes (e.g., distribution and light assembly), include relevant codes in your search. You can also expand from 4-digit to 3-digit codes to capture a broader set. Document which codes you used and why each is relevant to the tested party's functions.
Options: (1) Expand to 3-digit level for broader industry match, (2) Include related NACE codes with similar functions, (3) Expand geography to increase sample size, (4) Accept a smaller comparable set if quality is high. Document why expansion was necessary and how comparability is maintained.
Use actual activity. Companies' registered NACE codes may be outdated or reflect administrative choices. If a company registered as "wholesale distribution" (46.XX) actually manufactures products, search manufacturing codes (25-30). The goal is functional comparability, not matching registration codes.
NACE and SIC are different classification systems with approximate correspondence. Eurostat publishes official mapping tables. When using US databases (Compustat), you'll need SIC or NAICS codes. The mapping isn't always exact—verify that SIC code descriptions match your tested party's functions, not just the NACE equivalent.
Generally no. Holding companies (NACE 64.20) exist to hold investments and collect dividends—they don't perform operational functions comparable to distributors, manufacturers, or service providers. Including holding companies would introduce non-comparable entities. Explicitly exclude NACE 64.XX in most benchmarking searches.
Balance specificity and sample size. Four-digit codes provide the closest functional match but may yield few results. Three-digit codes are broader but risk including less comparable entities. Start at 4-digit; expand only if necessary. For common industries (wholesale distribution, manufacturing), 4-digit codes typically yield sufficient results.