Loading content...
Loading...
Loading...
Resale Price Method (RPM) — The resale price method (RPM) is a transfer pricing method that starts with the price at which a related party reseller sells goods to an independent customer, then subtracts an arm's length gross resale margin to determine the arm's length purchase price...
The resale price method (RPM) is a transfer pricing method that starts with the price at which a related-party reseller sells goods to an independent customer, then subtracts an arm's length gross resale margin to determine the arm's length purchase price from the related supplier.
RPM is a traditional transaction method focused on the reseller's gross margin. It is most useful for buy-sell distributors that resell goods without significant transformation or unique value creation.
Basic formula:
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) describe RPM in Chapter II at . The Guidelines explain that RPM begins with the resale price charged to an independent party and reduces that price by an appropriate gross margin for the reseller's functions, assets, and risks.
The OECD notes that RPM is generally most useful for marketing operations and resellers, particularly where the reseller does not add substantial value to the product before resale.
US Treasury Regulations Section 1.482-3(c) describe the resale price method for transfers of tangible property.
RPM is a distributor-side method. It asks how much gross margin an independent distributor would retain for performing comparable distribution functions under comparable conditions.
RPM often fits when:
RPM is often weak when:
Internal comparables can be especially useful for RPM. If the same distributor buys similar products from unrelated suppliers and resells them under comparable conditions, those gross margins may provide stronger evidence than broad external distributor searches.
Scenario: SpainCo buys finished goods from its related manufacturer and resells them to independent retailers. SpainCo performs routine warehousing, logistics, and sales support but does not modify the products.
| Metric | Amount |
|---|---|
| Third-party resale revenue | EUR 10,000,000 |
| Arm's length gross margin | 25.0% |
| Gross margin amount | EUR 2,500,000 |
| Implied arm's length purchase price | EUR 7,500,000 |
Calculation:
If comparable independent distributors earn gross margins of 22.0% to 28.0%, SpainCo's 25.0% gross margin supports an arm's length result.
| Issue | Resale Price Method | TNMM |
|---|---|---|
| Profit level | Gross margin | Net operating margin |
| Tested party | Usually the reseller | Usually the less complex party |
| Data sensitivity | Sensitive to COGS/OPEX classification | More tolerant of gross-level accounting differences |
| Best fit | Reliable distributor gross margins exist | Gross margin comparability is weak but net margins are reliable |
RPM can be more direct than TNMM when gross margins are reliable. TNMM is often more defensible where accounting differences, channel differences, or product mix make gross margin comparisons noisy.
RPM is most appropriate for routine distributors that buy goods from related suppliers and resell them to third parties without significant transformation. The method is strongest when reliable gross margin comparables exist.
RPM tests the reseller's gross margin. It asks whether the reseller retained enough gross profit to cover its selling and operating expenses and earn an arm's length profit for its functions, assets, and risks.
RPM is sensitive to gross-level accounting differences. If one company classifies freight, warranty, rebates, or support costs in COGS and another classifies them in operating expenses, their gross margins may not be comparable.
Not automatically. RPM may be better when reliable gross margin data exists and the distribution functions are closely comparable. TNMM may be better when gross margin data is unreliable but net operating margins can be benchmarked.
It can apply only if the added value does not materially undermine comparability or can be reliably adjusted. Significant manufacturing, customization, marketing intangibles, or bundled services often make RPM less reliable.